17047.png

The sexual dimorphism in the Tithonian, Jurassic, simoceratid ammonite Lytogyroceras

HORACIO PARENT and ENRIQUE RAMOS-AGUSTINO

The family Simoceratidae Spath, 1925, lumps various forms belonging to lineages with different roots and is clearly paraphyletic. One of its genera is Lytogyroceras Spath, 1924, which stands apart from the typical forms of the family bearing strong ribbing and tubercles. The sexual dimorphism of Lytogyroceras was supposed to be based only on adult size differences. Here we describe a recently collected lappeted microconch of Lytogyroceras subbeticum (Olóriz, 1978) from the Ponti Zone of Carchelejo (southern Spain). This microconch shows that the sexual dimorphism in the genus Lytogyroceras is not only characterized by different adult size of the sexes as formerly assumed, but also by different adult peristome morphology.

Introduction

The family Simoceratidae Spath, 1924, is paraphyletic and lumps various forms belonging to lineages of different origins (Enay and Howarth 2019). One of these genera that stands apart from the typical forms of the family bearing strong ribbing and tubercles, is Lytogyroceras Spath, 1925. The type species of this genus, by original designation, is Ammonites fasciatus Quenstedt, 1848, of which the holotype is refigured herein (Fig. 1A). The holotype is a macroconch, interpreted as a phragmocone with part of the body-chamber possibly preserved according to the large size relative to the microconch described below. The genus Lytogyroceras groups compressed evolute forms, strongly constricted, with ribbed inner whorls that become smooth up to the body-chamber; some doubtful cases with strong lateral and fine ventral ribbing in the adult whorls have been reported by Sarti (2020). The distribution and age of the genus are summarized in Enay and Howarth (2019), but the geographic distribution is larger than reported there (i.e., SE France, S Alps, Italy, Poland, and Hungary), including also Spain (e.g., Enay and Geyssant 1975; Olóriz 1978, Seyfried 1979), Germany—with a single record from a section near Ruhpolding in the Northern Calcareous Alps (Berger 2015), and an isolated record from Japan (Sato et al. 2008).

Sexual dimorphism of Lytogyroceras was supposed by Enay and Howarth (2019) to be based only on adult size differences. Nannarone and Bilotta (2021: 211, fig. 8a) suggested a tentative idealized reconstruction of the peristome with a small lappet and a rostrum. However, a recent collection of ammonites by one of the authors (ERA) from Carchelejo, southern Spain (see Parent et al. 2023), includes a perfect microconchiate specimen of Lytogyroceras subbeticum (Olóriz, 1978), with well-developed lappets (Fig. 1B). The specimen was collected loose in a scree, in the area where beds assignable to the Ponti–Jacobi zones crop out. The known stratigraphic range of Lytogyroceras is the Fallauxi to Ponti zones (Énay and Howarth 2019). In the collection from Carchelejo adult macroconchs occur frequently in the Ponti Zone, but the species was never collected from the overlying levels of the section. Thus, considering this information it can be assessed that the specimen most likely comes from the Ponti Zone.



20277.png

Fig. 1.­ Simoceratid ammonites of the genus Lytogyroceras. A. Lytogyceras fasciatus (Quenstedt, 1848), holotype (GPIT-PV-50085), from the Tithonian of Rovereto, NE of Lake Garda, Italy, interpreted herein as macroconch (female). B. Lytogyroceras subbeticum Olóriz, 1978, (SMNS-70695) from the Ponti– lower Microcanthum zones of Carchelejo, southern Spain, interpreted herein as complete adult microconch (male). Both species might be conspecific but it needs further work. Figure designed to represent natural size of the specimens. The asterisk indicates the last septum.


The lectotype of L. subbeticum, designated by Cecca (2002: 369), is the specimen figured by Olóriz (1978: pl. 19: 2) from the Ponti Zone. Lytogyroceras subbeticum is very likely a junior synonym of L. fasciatum because of the identity of the outer whorls, but since the inner whorls of the holotype of the latter are not preserved (Fig. 1A), a more complete study is needed to ascertain this synonymy. Moreover, L. fasciatum (Quenstedt, 1848) itself is considered a junior subjective syno­nym of L. strictum (Catullo, 1846) (e.g., Zittel 1870; Olóriz 1978; Főzy 1988; Főzy et al. 2022).

Institutional abbreviations.—GPIT, Tübingen University, Ger­many; SMNS, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Stuttgart, Germany.

Description of the microconch of Lytogyroceras subbeticum

The specimen (Fig. 1B) has a maximum diameter at peristome of 60 mm. The whorls have a subrectangular (juvenile) to ovate (adult), higher than wide section. The inner whorls are densely ribbed with slightly prosocline, undivided primaries. This ribbing fades gently from about 15 mm in diameter to almost smooth, only showing inconstant mild umbilical swellings and prosocline narrow constrictions. The last septum is at a diameter of 38 mm. The angular lenght of the body-chamber is 280°. After a radial constriction the lappets project in the upper half of the flanks. These are subtriangular, wide at the base, and moderately long (and the tip seems to be broken off). The specimen is an adult as the incipient uncoiling and lappets definitely indicate the end of growth.

The sexual dimorphism in Lytogyroceras

The identity of the inner whorls of contemporaneous ammonites which only differentiate in large and smaller morphs, with characteristic morphologies, from a critical (but varia­ble) diameter, is the strongest argument for their association as sexual dimorphs of a single species (e.g., Makowski 1962; Callomon 1963; see review in Klug et al. 2015). The establishment of sexual dimorphic pairs may produce different kinds of systematic, taxonomic, and/or nomenclatural changes (e.g., Maeda 1993; Parent and Zatoń 2016), or, like in the present case, it may consist of the simple first description of the microconch of a well-known species.

The microconch (male) of Lytogyroceras subbeticum described above shows that the sexual dimorphism in the genus Lytogyroceras is not only based on adult size differences between sexes as formerly supposed (Énay and Howarth 2019), but the microconchiate males bear well-developed lappets, as typical but not exclusive in the superfamily Perisphinctoidea.

All the nominal species of the genus Lytogyroceras are based on macroconch (female) specimens. The typical morphology, ornamentation and adult size of the adult macroconchs of Lytogyroceras are very well-characterized by the specimens from the Fallauxi Zone of Lókút Hill (Hungary) figured by Vígh (1984: pl. 3: 1–2). They are larger than our microconch and show a sigmoidal peristome, slightly expanded; the angular lenght of the body-chamber is about 330°.

Acknowledgements.—Günter Schweigert (Staatliches Museum für Natur­kunde, Stuttgart, Germany) for discussion, information, and material for comparison. Ingmar Werneburg and Henrik Stöhr (University of Tübingen, Germany) for information and photographs of specimens in the collection of the Tübingen University. The private collector Manuel Bellido (Córdoba, Spain) for sending us photographs of specimens in his collection. The reviewers Haruyoshi Maeda (The Kyushu University Museum, Fukuoka, Japan), Carlo Sarti (Universitá di Bologna, Italy), and an additional anonymous referee contributed to improve the manuscript.

References

Berger, G. 2015. Ammoniten aus dem oberen Malm (Tithonium) von Ruhpolding (Obb.). Natur und Mensch Jahresmitteilungen 2014: 35–60.

Callomon, J.H . 1963. Sexual Dimorphism in Jurassic Ammonites. Transa­ctions of the Leicester Literature and Philosophical Society 57: 21–56.

Catullo, T.A. 1846. Memoria geognostico-paleozoica sulle Alpi Venete. Memorie della Società Italiana delle Scienze residente in Modena 24: 1–158.

Cecca, F. 2002. Lytogyroceras subbeticum (Olóriz, 1978). In: G. Pavia and S. Cresta (eds.), Revision of Jurassic ammonites of the Gemmellaro collections. Quaderni del Museo Geologico G.G. Gemmellaro 6: 1–406.

Énay, R. and Geyssant, J.R. 1975. Faunes tithoniques des chaînes bétiques (Espagne méridionale). In: Colloque sur la limite Jurassique–Crétacé, Lyon, Nuchatêl, Septembere 1973. Mémoires du Bureau de recherches géologiques et minières 86: 39–55.

Énay, R. and Howarth, M.K. 2019. Systematic descriptions of the Perisphinctoidea. Part L, revised, volume 3B, chapter 7. Treatise Online 120: 1–184.

Főzy, I. 1988. Tithonian ammonites (Oppeliidae, Haploceratidae and Simoceratidae) from the Transdanubian Central Range, Hungary. Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvos Nominatae, Sectio Geologica 28: 43–119.

Főzy, I., Scherzinger, A., and Szives, O. 2022. Late Jurassic–Early Creta­ceous (Kimmeridgian–Barremian) ammonites of the Bakony Mountains. In: I. Főzy (ed.), Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous Fauna, Bio­stratigraphy and Basin Evolution in the Bakony Mountains (Transdanu­bian Range, Hungary), 243–360. GeoLitera Publishing House, Szeged.

Klug, C., Zatoń, M., Parent, H., Hostettler, B., and Tajika, A. 2015. Mature modifications and sexual dimorphism. In: C. Klug, D. Korn, K. DeBaets, I. Kruta, and R.H. Mapes (eds.), Ammonoid Paleobiology: From Anatomy to Ecology. Topics in Geobiology 43: 253–320. Crossref

Maeda, H. 1993. Dimorphism of Late Cretaceous false-puzosiine ammonites, Yokoyamaoceras Wright and Matsumoto, 1954 and Neopuzosia Matsumoto, 1954. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, New Series 169: 97–128.

Makowski, H. 1962. Problem of sexual dimorphism in ammonites. Palaeontologia Polonica 12: 1–92.

Nannarone, C. and Bilotta, M. 2021. Ammoniti Titoniani (Zone a Fallauxi e a Volanense) del Massiccio Monte Acuto-Monte Catria (Appennino Umbro-Marchigiano): Nuovi dati sulla famiglia Simoceratidae Spath, 1924. Annali del Museo Civico di Rovereto 37: 183–234.

Olóriz, F. 1978. Kimmeridgiense–Tithónico inferior en el sector central de las Cordilleras Béticas (Zona Subbética) – Paleontologia, Biostratigrafia. Tesis doctorales de la Universidad de Granada 184: 1–758.

Parent, H. and Zatoń, M. 2016. Sexual dimorphism in the Bathonian morphoceratid ammonite Polysphinctites tenuiplicatus. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 61: 875–884. Crossref

Parent, H., Ramos-Agustino, E., Scherzinger, A., and Schweigert, G. 2023. A new species of Pseudhimalayites (Ammonitina, Aspidoceratoidea) from the Lower Tithonian of the Betic Range, Southern Spain. Volumina Jurassica 21: 19–26. Crossref

Quenstedt, F.A. 1845–1849. Petrefaktenkunde Deutschlands. 1/1. Cephalopoden. 581 pp. Fues, Tübingen.

Sarti, C. 2020. Il Titoniano del Trento Plateau (Alpi Meridionali): faune ad Ammoniti, Stratigrafia e variazioni paleo-ambientali. Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali 99: 37–314.

Sato, T.,Tsujino, Y., Ishida, K., Kozai, K., and Hachiya, K. 2008. Newly collected Late Jurassic ammonites from Kurisaka, Tokushima Prefecture, Japan. Bulletins of the Tokushima Prefecture Museum 18: 1–20.

Seyfried, H. 1979. Der Subbetische Jura von Murcia (SE-Spanien). Geologisches Jahrbuch, Reihe B 29: 1–201.

Spath, L.F. 1924. On the Blake collection of ammonites from Kachh, India. Palaeontologica Indica (new series) 9 (Memoir 1): 1–29.

Spath, L.F. 1925. The collection of fossils and rocks from Somaliland made by B.N.K. Wyllie and W.R. Smellie. Part 7: Ammonites and aptychi. Monograph of the Geological Department of the Hunterian Museum 1: 111–164.

Vigh, G. 1984. Die biostratigraphische Auswertung einiger Ammoniten-­Faunen aus dem Tithon des Bakonygebirges sowie aus dem Tithon-­Berrrias des Gerecsegebirges [in Hungarian]. Jahrbuch der Ungarischen Geologi­schen Anstalt, Budapest 67: 1–210.

Zittel, K.A. 1870. Die Fauna der aelteren Cephalopoden fuehrender Tithonbildungen. Palaeontographica. Supplementbände 2: 1–192.

Horacio Parent [parent@fceia.unr.edu.ar; ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0346-9372 ], Laboratorio de Paleontología, IFG, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Rosario, Pellegrini 250, 2000 Rosario, Argentina.

Enrique Ramos-Agustino [eramosagus@gmail.com], C/Federico Castillo, 8.23005, Jaén, España.

Received 29 May 2024, accepted 10 July 2024, published online 28 August 2024.

Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 69 (3): 371–373, 2024

https://doi.org/10.4202/app.01175.2024